![](https://tnt23.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Ed-Soloe-indictment.jpg)
Following his indictment for “driving on revoked, suspended or expired,” Edward Soloe of Blount County, Tenn., files a motion to quash indictment with the criminal court of Monroe County, Tenn., and includes this affidavit.
![](https://tnt23.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Ed-Soloe-ID-1.jpeg)
I, Edward Soloe, being of sound mind and body, testify that I live in Blount County, Tenn., and affirm the following as true;
- That I exercise my rights of ingress and egress from my house or place of domicile, personally and as a man on the land in state of Tennessee, at all times preserving all of my God-given, constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable and inherent rights.
- At no time do I operate in a commercial capacity on the roads of Tennessee, nor any other state, nor drive or operate a motor vehicle carrying people or goods for hire as either a private or common carrier pursuant to T.C.A. § Titles 55 or 65;
- I travel the public roads in my private chattel, an automobile, for private purposes, private necessity and personal/family duties, and the exercise of various constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable, inherent and God-given rights;
- I hereby deny and rebut any presumption that I operate in commercial, profit-seeking or for-hire capacity using any instrumentality of commerce or affecting any public interest.
- Affiant has studied for nearly five years the state’s privilege structure as it relates to the use of the public right of way, and has determined that he is free to use the roads for harmless, innocent, personal, private and other purposes, and in exercise of his rights; by research, he discovers that it is illegal, oppressive, injurious, vexatious and tortious for any officer to interfere in the enjoyment of these rights. Statutes, court cases, law review articles and histories attest that there exists a distinction between two great categories of highway and roadway users. In one group, members of the traveling public such as himself; in the other, the world of transportation, traffic, shipping, trucking, hauling and the like, of which he is not a part, as he has not renewed the driving privilege since the 1990s.
- Further affiant saith not.
I swear the above and foregoing representation of facts is true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge and belief.
Related posts:
County sues Ed’s Supply over masks, in fight with empty gun, dirty hands
Wamp ousts attorney Taylor, who backs CV-19 fraud
Double whammy: Hirsch rips gun law, says cops act outside law in traffic cases
Deep state’s stealthy coup to ensure nothing changes
Notice project has potential to lead national police power reform
Charlottesville suppresses political liberty in name of safety
Noose continues to tighten, but no government or empire lasts forever
Tax boss stammers: Cars may only be ‘op-op-op-operated,’ not traveled in
Tradesman Parker refuses to plea, rejects lawyer bid as Sheriff Wilson stacks charges
Protest rips Berke, Lee abuse of commerce, travel as cops surveil church services
Local economy solution to acerebral spying: Avatar replacement therapy
Save wife from SWAT raid, drop effort to ‘improve’ or ‘save’ local schools
Judge warns Parker don’t fight without lawyer
Gravitt refuses to register the ‘deed’ of Title 55 reform, but stows trivia
Judge convicts Hirsch, denies 2 classes of travel to void constitutional rights
So, did the almighty rulers of Monroe County decide to allow this common man his rights?
Or, did they fine him and lock him into a cage until he gets his “mind right,” thereby, extending the criminal activity against him, and his rights?