
Following his indictment for “driving on revoked, suspended or expired,” Edward Soloe of Blount County, Tenn., files a motion to quash indictment with the criminal court of Monroe County, Tenn., and includes this affidavit.

I, Edward Soloe, being of sound mind and body, testify that I live in Blount County, Tenn., and affirm the following as true;
- That I exercise my rights of ingress and egress from my house or place of domicile, personally and as a man on the land in state of Tennessee, at all times preserving all of my God-given, constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable and inherent rights.
- At no time do I operate in a commercial capacity on the roads of Tennessee, nor any other state, nor drive or operate a motor vehicle carrying people or goods for hire as either a private or common carrier pursuant to T.C.A. § Titles 55 or 65;
- I travel the public roads in my private chattel, an automobile, for private purposes, private necessity and personal/family duties, and the exercise of various constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable, inherent and God-given rights;
- I hereby deny and rebut any presumption that I operate in commercial, profit-seeking or for-hire capacity using any instrumentality of commerce or affecting any public interest.
- Affiant has studied for nearly five years the state’s privilege structure as it relates to the use of the public right of way, and has determined that he is free to use the roads for harmless, innocent, personal, private and other purposes, and in exercise of his rights; by research, he discovers that it is illegal, oppressive, injurious, vexatious and tortious for any officer to interfere in the enjoyment of these rights. Statutes, court cases, law review articles and histories attest that there exists a distinction between two great categories of highway and roadway users. In one group, members of the traveling public such as himself; in the other, the world of transportation, traffic, shipping, trucking, hauling and the like, of which he is not a part, as he has not renewed the driving privilege since the 1990s.
- Further affiant saith not.
I swear the above and foregoing representation of facts is true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge and belief.
Related posts:
Son, as a Trail Life boy consider suffering as a Christian
Sen. Gardenhire’s fallacious claims about mass schooling
Powerful bare-faced defense vs. Lee-Coppinger edicts comes from anti-Vietnam war crank
Hammond says massacre risk too slight to shut down schools
Locke fed up with mask mandate as ‘device of mass control’
City receives notice seeking to halt illegal warrantless arrests
Notice to DA starts push to halt illegal insurance prosecutions
Is Airbnb free, or must it be be subject to city?
Corker says NSA collecting too little data on Americans
Christian laborer on trial to defend right to travel, have gun in truck cab
You are free, constitution exists — IF you act as if you believe it
Police ethics rules require ‘respect of constitutional rights’
Before fighting & rebuilding, we need repentance
TN highwayman program targeted by reform bill invites local corruption
Wamp says deputies rightly enforce warrantless arrest law
So, did the almighty rulers of Monroe County decide to allow this common man his rights?
Or, did they fine him and lock him into a cage until he gets his “mind right,” thereby, extending the criminal activity against him, and his rights?