Following his indictment for “driving on revoked, suspended or expired,” Edward Soloe of Blount County, Tenn., files a motion to quash indictment with the criminal court of Monroe County, Tenn., and includes this affidavit.
I, Edward Soloe, being of sound mind and body, testify that I live in Blount County, Tenn., and affirm the following as true;
- That I exercise my rights of ingress and egress from my house or place of domicile, personally and as a man on the land in state of Tennessee, at all times preserving all of my God-given, constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable and inherent rights.
- At no time do I operate in a commercial capacity on the roads of Tennessee, nor any other state, nor drive or operate a motor vehicle carrying people or goods for hire as either a private or common carrier pursuant to T.C.A. § Titles 55 or 65;
- I travel the public roads in my private chattel, an automobile, for private purposes, private necessity and personal/family duties, and the exercise of various constitutionally guaranteed, unalienable, inherent and God-given rights;
- I hereby deny and rebut any presumption that I operate in commercial, profit-seeking or for-hire capacity using any instrumentality of commerce or affecting any public interest.
- Affiant has studied for nearly five years the state’s privilege structure as it relates to the use of the public right of way, and has determined that he is free to use the roads for harmless, innocent, personal, private and other purposes, and in exercise of his rights; by research, he discovers that it is illegal, oppressive, injurious, vexatious and tortious for any officer to interfere in the enjoyment of these rights. Statutes, court cases, law review articles and histories attest that there exists a distinction between two great categories of highway and roadway users. In one group, members of the traveling public such as himself; in the other, the world of transportation, traffic, shipping, trucking, hauling and the like, of which he is not a part, as he has not renewed the driving privilege since the 1990s.
- Further affiant saith not.
I swear the above and foregoing representation of facts is true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge and belief.
Related posts:
1 Bible chapter defeats paper money, ends welfare state, puts G’ma back in family
Dealing with police on side of road
You know you’re safe: Barnes has 100% discretion to ignore law
6th Circuit upholds decision to strip Knoxville cop of immunity in shooting
City police powers limited upon users of cars, trucks from out of town
Luman refuses attorney in fighting 'traffic' arrest case
TVA arrests family in traffic stop as agency claims total TN jurisdiction
'Half the time they don't bring' TN inmate medications
Hirsch defends right of private travel in TN trial in 5-year-old case
Judge Steelman upholds limits, wrecks DA’s ‘safety zone’ plan vs. purported gangs
Claiming the future, TN man endures terror demands of small GA town
Foster care system center of human trafficking, sex for sale
Guano gets idea of ignoring law from Christians who reject God’s law
Jailing of mercy reporter gives huge gain in fight against oppression
Mayors impose ‘directives,’ but have authority only for ‘orders,’ ‘injunctions’ after notice, hearin...
So, did the almighty rulers of Monroe County decide to allow this common man his rights?
Or, did they fine him and lock him into a cage until he gets his “mind right,” thereby, extending the criminal activity against him, and his rights?