III. With malice, city, county ignore your rights protected under administrative notice

Marie Mott speaks at the end of the fifth anti-police march in Chattanooga — one of about 30 aimed at police brutality and violence that often begins at what are euphemiscially called “traffic stops.” At right in Cameron “C-Grimey” Williams. (Photo David Tulis)

The law in Tennessee requires a party “put on awares” by notice to adjust his understanding and activity accordingly. But city of Chattanooga, Hamilton County and other parties have ignored Tennessee transportation administrative notice, which places liability for oppressive acts upon individual officers whose employers have not notified them of the disabilities (limits) in the so-called traffic laws they are enforcing. My 2 1/2-year-old legal reform project to halt this key element of Jim Crow in the South will take court action to gain wider effect. Part III of the Roland Mcclendon interview at The DeProgram Show.

City claims authority to regulate vehicles for hire

Where is city’s authority to enforce Title 55, other state laws? Let’s check charter

Judge Shattuck OKs officer’s contempt, shows partiality in violation of ethics rules

No vax mandate job board goes global

Luman faces rickety ‘driving’ case filed by deputy, jury, Pinkston

'Double nickel' traffic-stop reform = change of morals for city

County attorney: Sheriff Hammond responsible on missing Luman car

If Hammond obeys Title 55, will he face clawback suits by earlier victims?

Kids’ play: Cops, DAs duck in court when you ask ‘essential elements’ of ‘driving’

Cops drag woman out of car under commercial transportation law

Notice irrelevant if courts reject freedom it claims, lawyer says

Ex-Marine wins right for trial in bogus traffic arrest by deputies Wilkey, McRae