I counterattack vs. loan shark industry in Tennessee by defending a suit by Flexibility Capital, a so-called business funder or buyer of future receivables in a Nov. 14, 2023, hearing before the court of appeals in Knoxville. Flexibility is represented by Mary Cheadle of Nashville, ignoring most of my claims about fraud in the contract, fraud on the court and fraud by a member of the bar.
Mary Cheadle dismisses my “no subject jurisdiction for unconscionable contract” claim by saying my notice of appeal is untimely.
Related posts:
Engineer says Gaddy house ‘100% structurally sound’
Top justice gets demand to open judicial conference to TN press
Council should face duty: Defend people vs. Berke employees’ violence
Airbnb plan voids 3 citizen protections, turds ‘Gig’ open economy spirit
Group demands Skrmetti investigate misuse of ‘mandatory insurance’ law as a state fraud
As tyranny grows, Americans wait helplessly
Doctors with cash practices find way into local economy
Factory’s local cuts warn reliance on national economy comes with perils
Immunity sovereign and absolute: How the state plays god
Administrative notice tells city its authority is limited
Blame insurance for rise of modern state; might we escape?
Interview: State is trafficker in weird securities — car titles, birth certificates
Would you indemnify, hold harmless public school by signing a form?
City OKs woman’s Airbnb despite plea to avoid neighborhood change
Judge frees Watt from malicious prosecution after 569 days
It sounds like the so-called contract is “void ab initio” due to fraud in the inducement to enter a contract. Fraud (non-disclosure) vitiates the most solemn of contracts.
Should be easy to get the judges on board with that Maxim of Law.