I counterattack vs. loan shark industry in Tennessee by defending a suit by Flexibility Capital, a so-called business funder or buyer of future receivables in a Nov. 14, 2023, hearing before the court of appeals in Knoxville. Flexibility is represented by Mary Cheadle of Nashville, ignoring most of my claims about fraud in the contract, fraud on the court and fraud by a member of the bar.
Mary Cheadle dismisses my “no subject jurisdiction for unconscionable contract” claim by saying my notice of appeal is untimely.
Related posts:
Hole in Chattanooga investment co-op theory: Insider favoritism
State paroles Whipple, who learns art of legal war in cell
Constitution bars martial law, especially when officials ignore controlling statute
City cop draws gun on shoe store owner, pats him down
Long backs idea of free trade zone in housing
Wilson deputy: ‘I don’t give a f--- about your rights, they don’t mean shit to me’
Municipal Ponzi collapse is certain across U.S.; Crockett sizes up threat
Vague rule on ‘frustrating,’ ‘interfering’ gives cover as TN judges duck
Sheriff ignores law 400 days, sweeping up the citizenry
Engineer says Gaddy house ‘100% structurally sound’
Berke bows needlessly to rule, adds housing woes, Long says
Jailhouse lawyer Harmer on ‘inactive’ status as sentence ends
U.S. sky stripe program boosted by huge coal ash sector
Judge shafts wife of plaintiff, gets brief suspension
Jennings defies deathcare chains; flying blind under socialism, suppression of dissent, 9/11 questio...
It sounds like the so-called contract is “void ab initio” due to fraud in the inducement to enter a contract. Fraud (non-disclosure) vitiates the most solemn of contracts.
Should be easy to get the judges on board with that Maxim of Law.