I counterattack vs. loan shark industry in Tennessee by defending a suit by Flexibility Capital, a so-called business funder or buyer of future receivables in a Nov. 14, 2023, hearing before the court of appeals in Knoxville. Flexibility is represented by Mary Cheadle of Nashville, ignoring most of my claims about fraud in the contract, fraud on the court and fraud by a member of the bar.
Mary Cheadle dismisses my “no subject jurisdiction for unconscionable contract” claim by saying my notice of appeal is untimely.
Related posts:
10 judicial abuses shipwreck suit to end CV-19 state of disaster
Red Bank police chief refuses to meet over violence, profanity
Department of revenue getting served financial responsibility lawsuit via registered mail
How does Fleenor let Lee fraud ‘subsist, infiltrate, be subsidized in chancery?’
Hammond mulls 7 questions on travel right, transportation privilege
Beyond textbooks at homeschool expo; Power of games, field guides
‘That’s about as close to alchemy as you can get’ — Kelly eyes city gains riding U.S. millions, real...
Police violence invites local economy remedy: Peacekeeper app
Boyd reveals ‘confidential’ details of tourism bureau
Gravitt refuses to register the ‘deed’ of Title 55 reform, but stows trivia
Chattanooga elites stuck on factory school paradigm despite warnings
24-day ‘quarantine’ directive lacks basis in law
Stepping over turd in road as TAN sheds liberty light
Program to harass motorists not in statute, doesn’t exist, chief says
If national economy crashes, use Catanzaro theory to break out
It sounds like the so-called contract is “void ab initio” due to fraud in the inducement to enter a contract. Fraud (non-disclosure) vitiates the most solemn of contracts.
Should be easy to get the judges on board with that Maxim of Law.