I counterattack vs. loan shark industry in Tennessee by defending a suit by Flexibility Capital, a so-called business funder or buyer of future receivables in a Nov. 14, 2023, hearing before the court of appeals in Knoxville. Flexibility is represented by Mary Cheadle of Nashville, ignoring most of my claims about fraud in the contract, fraud on the court and fraud by a member of the bar.
Mary Cheadle dismisses my “no subject jurisdiction for unconscionable contract” claim by saying my notice of appeal is untimely.
Related posts:
For 90 days, Fleenor stifles plea for relief as people wail
Fluoride eats away fixtures, pipes, water plant storage rooms
In state factory school, pressure builds against Muslim propaganda
Olsen withdraws case after harassment in mask fight
If local economy were a conspiracy, would you be convicted?
North Shore of Chattanooga a microcosm of local economy concept
Feds launch data-dense ‘precrime’ program to enhance control, fear
If city obeys Miranda rule, it sharpens prosecutor Pinkston's blade
When companies export profit from local economy, negative multiplier effect kicks in
I bailed out of insurance to better serve my patients, slash costs
Berke would make enemies if takes tough action over roadside abuses
As tyranny grows, Americans wait helplessly
Body cams will make cops more visible as standing army
Pediatric RN sues Erlanger CEO over jab threats
Engineer wants to build larger net by which to trap Tennesseans
It sounds like the so-called contract is “void ab initio” due to fraud in the inducement to enter a contract. Fraud (non-disclosure) vitiates the most solemn of contracts.
Should be easy to get the judges on board with that Maxim of Law.