Related posts:
Cops execute homeless man for his own good
Safety dept. uses ID illegally to 'give' driver license, Murphy says
It's getting near time to celebrate; Centralized system seems at peak
Memorial Day celebrates power, virtue of state with religious fervor
Couvillon delivers notice to Kelly regarding mass CV-19 swindle
Gnome insists on roadway rights apart from licensing demands
Must pay up front to sue for false arrest, attorney says of reporter’s risky case
Devon Patrick Kelley's sermon notes in TX church massacre
AG hints ‘Coty Coyote’ complaint must be upon her law license
Uncle faces demand: Did you raid Gibson because owner conservative?
Mott decries harsh cops, exclusion of poor, demands city change
Privilege is handle by which state controls us; travel, driving distinct
Christians, let's rebuild: David Tulis on administrative notice, fighting for the poor
Hammond gets help on key question: Does travel = transportation?
Trump no help; police state tactics worsen against Americans
There is an ancient maxim of the law that states ignorantia juris non excusat, or “ignorance of the law does not excuse.” Put another way, it is presumed that the public knows the laws, and a defense of ignorance is typically not allowed. So, if the public in general is presumed to know the law, even if they have never even actually seen and read it, then how is it possible for those empowered by we the people to serve within the executive and judicial departments of government in order to apply and enforce the laws to ever be able to claim ignorance as the basis for their getting an interpretation, application, or ruling on any given law completely wrong in any or every possible way or completely in spite of it?…
by Eddie Craig