Related posts:
Judges kill complaints against them by holding ‘office of trust’ in legislative branch
DOS denies Luman a new driver license
Courts convert cars, homes into constitution-free zones, OK cop brutality
20 years of U.S. sponsored tyranny & rise of security -industrial complex
City adopts state ‘driving with cellphone’ law
Soddy-Daisy roadblock hits 2 nights over holiday
City acted in good faith in mass evictions, reporter Cook says
Neo-Nazi protest reveals family squabble with major parties
Cop arrests pedestrian who refuses to show driver license; he files complaint
Pressure intensifies to keep people from seeking redress of grievances
Protesters cry for relief as ‘system’ closes itself off from feedback
Just as city fell into injustice one person at a time, so will it become just amid reform
Cops traumatize innocent family in search for minor theft suspect
God flicks Fleenors upon us to make us squirm, but hates unjust judges
Affidavit of mistake in your traffic case
There is an ancient maxim of the law that states ignorantia juris non excusat, or “ignorance of the law does not excuse.” Put another way, it is presumed that the public knows the laws, and a defense of ignorance is typically not allowed. So, if the public in general is presumed to know the law, even if they have never even actually seen and read it, then how is it possible for those empowered by we the people to serve within the executive and judicial departments of government in order to apply and enforce the laws to ever be able to claim ignorance as the basis for their getting an interpretation, application, or ruling on any given law completely wrong in any or every possible way or completely in spite of it?…
by Eddie Craig