Related posts:
Terrorism makes peoples, states quake with fear; Bible gives right response
Roland Mcclendon’s ’Deprogram Show’ explores ending cop abuse of travelers
Chief Fletcher stirs against prison industrial complex
James demands Berke meeting over crooked cop Hughes
Davis’ interposition defies lawless authority; Republicans disappoint
Knowles tag office relents as reporter insists on right to make video
Motorist punched, beaten, arrested, hospitalized over broken taillight
Gardenhire kills ‘constitutional carry’ by ‘blowing smoke,’ Harris says
Troopers may stop you for ‘sole purpose’ to check driver license
City put on notice about warrantless arrest power limits as Lee weighs travel ‘crackdown’
At-home violence soars; abuse by cops, outnumbered 500 to 1, ahead if seige drags on
Unseeing of 136,700 TN jab deaths, Wamp taps well-oiled Cogswell as med examiner
Wamp: 2 years probation or 1,270 years in prison for plumber Ray
Just as city fell into injustice one person at a time, so will it become just amid reform
Gun ban tailored to keep blacks suppressed
There is an ancient maxim of the law that states ignorantia juris non excusat, or “ignorance of the law does not excuse.” Put another way, it is presumed that the public knows the laws, and a defense of ignorance is typically not allowed. So, if the public in general is presumed to know the law, even if they have never even actually seen and read it, then how is it possible for those empowered by we the people to serve within the executive and judicial departments of government in order to apply and enforce the laws to ever be able to claim ignorance as the basis for their getting an interpretation, application, or ruling on any given law completely wrong in any or every possible way or completely in spite of it?…
by Eddie Craig