CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Friday, July 21, 2023 — The white legal and political establishment is working overtime in abusing the people in Georgia and Tennessee in their private communications.
By David Tulis / NoogaRadio Network
➤ A North Georgia six-person jury on Wednesday convicts GMO-free and open-range traveler Gregory Parker, a Fort Oglethorpe family man with wife and two children who as matter of Christian and constitutional principle lives out the block letters on the back of his red old pickup truck, “Not for hire.”
➤ In Alcoa, Tenn., unemployed Edward Soloe is preparing in detail to deconstruct the fraudulent premise of traffic stops by challenging their underlying presumption. He has a hearing Monday and a jury trial Thursday in Monroe County, Tenn., in the criminal court of Madisonville. A single charge — driving on suspended April 17, 2022 — is in view. Mr. Soloe is defending himself, with public defender elbow counsel Todd Gee of Cleveland and assistant DA Ryan Fetters unwilling to admit that privilege law at Tenn. Code Ann. § Titles 55 and 65 operates upon privileged activity (such as “driving” and “operating”), and not promiscuously upon Gran’ma and myriad other private parties communicating, traveling and exercising their rights on the people’s property outside of any exchange of money.
➤ This radio reporter is resisting an attack on the registration of his 2000 Honda Odyssey minivan by the Tennessee departments of safety and revenue for his not having a motor vehicle insurance policy.
Revenue commissioner David Gerregano and safety’s Jeff Long are fraudulently enforcing the Tennessee financial responsibility act of 1977 to criminally prosecute him and hundreds of thousands of people on the roads without insurance. Tenn. Code Ann. § Title 55, chapter 12, and two appellate court cases say Tennessee is an “after-crash” state, with no requirement upon the traveling public to “show proof of insurance.”
Their alliance with the insurance industry nets the state nearly F$100 million a year and insurance companies a large share of about F$3.3 billion a year in insurance premiums for registered autos.
‘Not for hire’
A superior court jury of 6 Walker County residents convict Mr. Parker at the end of a day long trial in superior court of Walker County one that witness Jon Luman compares to ”a big kangaroo court proceeding.” Mr. Parker insists he is not in the profession of driving and operating a common carrier motor vehicle under Georgia safety commissioner John F. King and has caused no offense to anybody by using the public road. He faced two charges of driving on revoked and two charges of driving without insurance from two arrests.
Judge John Dennis ordered him immediately taken to jail to begin a two-month jail sentence to be followed by a one-year probation. But that’s not all. “If he accomplishes getting his license back,” Mr. Luman says, “in the first probation, then he won’t have to do the four months in jail on the second set of counts.”
At least one F$1,000 fine is included in the punishment.
“I actually talked with Greg this morning,” Mr. Parker’s wife, Kasee, says. “He actually got through, and called me. He got booked this morning. I’ve been trying to call down there to find out his inmate is, like his inmate number, and I’m not having any luck getting through on their system.” She says she needs to start working on an appeal for Mr. Parker, having had contact with an attorney, Alan Norton, who’s reviewing a recent attack upon Mr. Parker in which a cop shattered a car window upon daughter Jocelynn in a Wendy’s parking lot.
“He asked them questions if they knew the definition of this and this, and they kept saying, ‘Objection,” ‘irrelevant.’” He asked about commerce, and they kept shutting him down. They would not hear” his questions for the fact witness, Deputy Simpson, serving Sheriff Steve Wilson. Mrs. Parker sees the Walker jailers as likely to attempt to keep Mr. Parker in solitary confinement.
David review of Parker case, Jon Luman interview
“Greg attempted to ask the deputy if he was aware of the definitions of driver, operator and person,” Mr. Luman says.
Person was where he started because the so-called law addresses persons in particular and doesn’t mention people, which is just a small detail that goes over everybody’s heads. He was interrupted at every opportunity. The solicitor objected and claimed that relevance was the reason for the objection. And the dutiful judge — the so-called judge — who has not acquired jurisdiction— and that is why Billy Mullinax recused himself, because he didn’t want to commit the treason — and so this guy, whose name is John Dennis, was brought in to do that. They just interrupted and objected and the judge, so-called, sustained every objection and instructed the jury to strike the question and whatever answer the deputy was able to state.
Bills of lading, manifests, contracts, passenger lists, agreement, waybills — Mr. Luman says Mr. Parker pleaded such essential elements of transportation but could not get questions of such proofs, or lack thereof, to be produced for the jury.
The officer “saw Greg ‘driving a motor vehicle,’” Mr. Luman says. Mr. Parker “tried to pursue that driving is a commercial activity.”
Says Christopher Sapp, NoogaRadio midstate bureau chief, of the Soloe arrest video: “These officers sounded giddy and gleeful to ‘hook him up.’ The state-sponsored ’sovereign citizen’ training they have received has blinded their minds to the deprivation of rights one enjoys to travel upon the roads in pursuit of the right to enjoy life, liberty, and happiness outside of the commercial ‘privilege’ or a contract with the state for the same.”
Mr. Soloe says Madisonville copcam has deletions. “You cannot properly defend yourself without full disclosure of the missing bodycam evidence which could be exculpatory in nature,” says Mr. Sapp, adding that a defendant who is denied all the evidence cannot “adequately prepare for trial; otherwise it is grounds for sanctions and a continuation of the matter.”
You do not mention whether the police or court of the corporation has proven jurisdiction/authority with regard to Mr. Soloe of Alcoa.
This is an important question that demands challenge and answer by the corporate forces imposing the edicts of Washington D.C. upon the People of the Republic state of Tennessee.
The reason that it is so important is that within our Republic states jurisdiction/authority cannot be simply presumed, or assumed. Especially when challenged by a citizen of the Republic state, a holder of ALL power within the Republic. An example is the finding of the court, with regard to Hagan V. Lavine.
Hagan v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 533, n.5. “Where jurisdiction is denied and squarely challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed to exist ‘sub silento’ but must be proven.” Hagan v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 533, n.5.
“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings” [Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533] “If any tribunal finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over person and subject matter, the case must be dismissed.” [Louisville R.R. v. Motley, 211 U.S. 149, 29 S. Ct. 42]
I do know for sure that Greg Parker has Lawfully and properly squarely challenged jurisdiction/authority with regard to him, and the subject matter and he sits in the jail of a corporation named “WALKER COUNTY GOVERNMENT” where 5 county commissioners claim to be the “authority for government” in open defiance of the Georgia Constitution, and in complete denial of Greg Parker’s inherent rights as a man.
Having never acquired jurisdiction the actions of a jury composed of “U.S. citizens”, and a man acting as a judge while having never acquired jurisdiction/authority, are necessarily “Void ab initio” in accordance with the Law of the Georgia Republic.
Paragraph I. Life, liberty, and property. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or
property except by due process of law.
Paragraph II. Protection to person and property; equal protection. Protection to person and property is the paramount duty of government and shall be impartial and complete. No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.
Paragraph III. Freedom of conscience. Each person has the natural and inalienable right to worship God, each according to the dictates of that person’s own conscience; and no human authority should, in any case, control or interfere with such right of conscience.
Paragraph XI. Right to trial by jury; number of jurors; selection and compensation of
jurors. (a) The right to trial by jury shall remain inviolate, except that the court shall render judgment without the verdict of a jury in all civil cases where no issuable defense is filed and where a jury is not demanded in writing by either party. In criminal cases, the defendant shall have a public and speedy trial by an impartial jury; and the jury shall be the >>>>>judges<<<<<<<< of the law and the facts.
Paragraph XIV. Benefit of counsel; accusation; list of witnesses; compulsory process.
Every person charged with an offense against the laws of this state shall have the privilege and benefit of counsel; shall be furnished with a copy of the accusation or indictment and, on demand, with a list of the witnesses on whose testimony such charge is founded; shall have compulsory process to obtain the testimony of that person's own witnesses; and shall be confronted with the witnesses testifying against such person.
Paragraph I. Origin and foundation of government. All government, of right, originates with the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.
Public officers are the trustees and servants of the people and are at all times
amenable to them.
Paragraph II. Object of government. The people of this state have the inherent right of regulating their internal government. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people; and at all times they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good may require it.
Oh yeah, since the solicitor general of Walker County Georgia likes to propose that the Georgia Legislature has acted to command the People of Georgia (which by the Georgia Constitution includes U.S. citizens residing within the Republic state).
He should be demanding that the judge declare such act VOID. Since he also claims to be the STATE OF GEORGIA (the Republic state where Gregory Parker has been imprisoned for determining that he is one of the People of Georgia).
Paragraph V. What acts void. Legislative acts in violation of this Constitution or the Constitution of the United States are void, and the judiciary shall so declare them.
That, when Dennis becomes a clerk masquerading as a Judge, he walks away from any immunity he may enjoy, and becomes personally liable.
“Judge loses his absolute immunity from damage actions only when he acts in clear absence of all jurisdiction or performance of an act which is not judicial in nature.” Schucker v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202
“When enforcing mere statutes, judges of all courts do not act judicially” and thus are not protected by “qualified” or “limited immunity,” SEE: Owen v. City, 445 U.S. 662; Bothke v. Terry, 713 F2d 1404
That the judgment in Dennis’s so-called court, is brutum fulmen.
“brutum fulmen”: “An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone. Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum, “Judgments” §§ 499, 512 546, 549. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition.
15 That, Dennis refused to recuse himself in accordance with Title 28 U.S. Code, subsection 144, is evidence of his lack of oath of office to protect Greg Parker’s rights, a violation of his requirement to uphold his oath to judicial canons, and is an assault against Greg Parker under the color of their so-called law.
“Color” means “An appearance, semblance, or simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real. A prima facia or apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance, a plausible, assumed exterior, concealing a lack of reality; a disguise or pretext. See also colorable.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, on page 240.
“Color, color. Signifies a probable plea, but which is in fact false…” Tomlin’s Law Dictionary 1835, Volume 1
“Colorable” means “That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit feigned, having the appearance of truth.” Windle v. Flinn, 196 Or. 654, 251 P.2d 136, 146.
“Color of Law – Mere semblance of a legal right. An action done under color of law is one done with the apparent authority of law but actually in contravention of law.” Barron’s Dictionary of Canadian Law, Sixth Edition, page 51,