Related posts:
Become ‘Local Economy Man’ with these 12 steps
Noblett: City rules trump constitutional rights
Church makes final steps to free itself by dissolving corporation
Medium boots reporter whose suit slips dirk in heart of CV-19 fraud
Hammond’s abuse of shipping law strips travelers of rights
Obedience to God’s law would reshape courts, society, economy of city
Tow truck driver indicted for bringing rational thinking into marketplace
U.S. ‘smart city’ climate plan for Chattanooga reaches for sky, finds iron, dust
When cops kill, agency focuses on ‘stress disorders’ for officer after ‘incident’
Administrative notice puts officials on their guard, may stem abuses
If stealing country were a tort, getting it back might be ‘action in replevin’
Ignoring notice, city raises aggravation factor of cop tort liability
Prayer before panel declares God’s claims, but, under pressure, buckles
Unlike cops, sheriffs exercise judicial power, not executive
Shocking legal terminology for cop's execution of citizen
There is an ancient maxim of the law that states ignorantia juris non excusat, or “ignorance of the law does not excuse.” Put another way, it is presumed that the public knows the laws, and a defense of ignorance is typically not allowed. So, if the public in general is presumed to know the law, even if they have never even actually seen and read it, then how is it possible for those empowered by we the people to serve within the executive and judicial departments of government in order to apply and enforce the laws to ever be able to claim ignorance as the basis for their getting an interpretation, application, or ruling on any given law completely wrong in any or every possible way or completely in spite of it?…
by Eddie Craig