Related posts:
America at edge of nervous breakdown, with doc, nurse, orderly being military-style cops
Council hopeful Clark thumps police nail on head: Reform — or face drastic budget cuts
Model for liberty, confidence, openness: Old Israel with no border wall
How does Fleenor let Lee fraud ‘subsist, infiltrate, be subsidized in chancery?’
Abuse at Erlanger rises from unjust judge Fleenor OK’ing fraud
How by act of levitation feds turn marriage law into empty shell
Lee signs messy permitless carry bill; what does it do?
‘Fiddle Man’ of Lawrenceburg demands verdict be overturned, right to travel
Uncle’s push for ‘background check’ in weapon sales attacks free market
Main Street battlefield: The state’s ongoing war on Americans
500,000 criminal convictions next 5 years — why I sue to stop TN government fraud
Petitioner says judge oversight panel violates separation of powers law, must go
Christian fireman who ignored 2 of 10 commandments fired over emails
Petition: Tennesseans no longer able to secure rights
Trespass arrest expunged as TN courts tighten secrecy controls
There is an ancient maxim of the law that states ignorantia juris non excusat, or “ignorance of the law does not excuse.” Put another way, it is presumed that the public knows the laws, and a defense of ignorance is typically not allowed. So, if the public in general is presumed to know the law, even if they have never even actually seen and read it, then how is it possible for those empowered by we the people to serve within the executive and judicial departments of government in order to apply and enforce the laws to ever be able to claim ignorance as the basis for their getting an interpretation, application, or ruling on any given law completely wrong in any or every possible way or completely in spite of it?…
by Eddie Craig