Global elites are in favor of developing science so that governments can control the weather. The press coverage of this phenomenon almost universally suggests that the science has yet to be developed. But, as we report on this website under the “sky striping” category, geoengineering of the weather by pollution is an old story, and a developed technology.
By David Tulis / NoogaRadio Network
Claus Schwab, executive chairman of World Economic Forum, is a U.N. booster and highly influential shaker and mover who argues that total management and total quality control of life in the hands of elites and international groups includes being able to control the weather.
Meanwhile, dissenting scientist J. Marvin Herndon and researcher and public health director Mark Whiteside condemn the existing program of government secretive programs to control the weather by using pollution emissions as a “treason” against the planet and against all living things.
Dr. Schwab looks forward to what he wants readers to understand is a future program that has yet to be developed. He calls sky striping, or chemtrailing, as a work of “bold imagination” in his book, Covid 10: The Great Reset.
Whether one approves of the idea or not, geoengineering (also called “climate engineering”) is a feast of imagination. It consists in intervening deliberately and on a large scale in the Earth’s climate system to alter or even repair the climate by reducing or reversing the processes that exacerbate climate change. This “mammoth” idea that would have seemed incongruous if not unimaginable just a few decades ago is now a serious – although radical – option to stave off a possible climate catastrophe. It has been popularized by scientists like David King who suggests refreezing the Arctic by covering the region with white clouds or Gernot Wagner whose book (aptly entitled The Gamble) proposes to reflect sunlight away from the Earth by injecting aerosols into the stratosphere. Geoengineering involves consequential risks, ranging from air pollution to all sorts of unanticipated climate effects. It also poses exceedingly complex scientific, ethical and governance issues.
Do humans have the right to deliberately change the climate? Who would have the authority to make the decision to geoengineer the climate? How would it be controlled and governed? Who would fund such a project? These fundamental questions remain unanswered but are under debate in academic and policy circles. This is again a tribute to humans’ capacity “to deal with a problem” (the definition of imagination) and to devise innovative and unexpected solutions (albeit disputed by many). Geoengineering is not for tomorrow morning but, as the climate crisis worsens, such a radical and controversial approach will come up for serious consideration. When it does, the imaginative power of a small group of scientists will have paved the way for such a decision. Fast-expanding knowledge lies at the heart of these four imaginative policies, ideas, products and projects. [emphasis added]
Note that Schwab indicates that sky striping “is not for tomorrow morning” but a future “controversial approach” to be developed by parties who have mastered “exceedingly complex *** ethical *** issues.”
As I have reported in detail, sky striping and geoengineering are a local story, with the oppression of policy pollution imposed upon people in Southeast Tennessee and the Chattanooga area.
Dissenting scientists
Dissenting scientist J. Marvin Herndon is the researcher who determined the nature of the elements deposited by jets in the sky. His many papers on geoengineering are available at his website, http://www.nuclearplanet.com/.
Dr. Herndon runs Transdyne Corp., San Diego. His collaborator is Dr. Mark Whiteside, Florida Department of Health, Key West, Fla.
Abstract
Earth’s life support systems are breaking down, including the stratospheric ozone layer, which protects all higher life on the planet from deadly ultraviolet radiation. This breakdown is a direct result of human activities including the large-scale manipulation of processes that affect Earth’s climate, otherwise known as geoengineering. We present further evidence that coal fly ash, utilized in tropospheric aerosol geoengineering, is the primary cause of stratospheric ozone depletion, not chlorofluorocarbons, as “decreed” by the Montreal Protocol. The misdiagnosis was a potentially fatal mistake by mankind. Coal fly ash particles, uplifted to the stratosphere, are collected and trapped by polar stratospheric clouds. In springtime, as these clouds begin to melt/evaporate, multiple coal fly ash compounds and elements are released to react with and consume stratospheric ozone. Contrary to the prevailing narrative, the stratospheric ozone layer has already been badly damaged and now increasingly deadly ultraviolet radiation, UV-B and UV-C, penetrates to Earth’s surface. Our time is short to permanently end all geoengineering activities, and to reduce and/or eliminate all sources of aerosolized coal fly ash, including first and foremost the jet-sprayed emplacements into the troposphere that are systematically breaking down Earth’s support systems and poisoning life on this planet.
Deliberate collapse of earth’s biosphere
Anyone with a deep connection to nature can see how badly the natural world is suffering. Once healthy forest are now dying. Fields and roadsides no longer bustle with insect life and each spring and fall migration brings fewer and fewer birds. The richness and diversity of life on Earth is disappearing at an incredible rate (Figure 1). Beyond the explosion of species extinction, there are massive population declines of both plants and animals with cascading effects on ecosystems necessary for our continued existence [1]. Human activities have destroyed over two-thirds of the world’s wildlife in just the past fifty years [2, 3] and there is no end in sight. Few scientists have found the courage to sound the alarm about our dire situation [4]. And far fewer realize that much of our current environmental crisis is deliberately caused.
Marvin Herndon live report on FB
Science appropriately applied has the potential to improve life on Earth. But for decades Earth science has been twisted and defiled, used as a tool to disrupt natural processes on a global scale, to destroy life, and to deceive humanity. Here we disclose the causal commonality underlying the collapse of the biosphere which, we submit, constitutes no less than Planetary Treason.
United Nations complicity The United Nations has been at the forefront of activities related to the destruction of Earth’s natural environment and the collapse of the biosphere.
The 1978 United Nations’ “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques” [ENMOD] [5], as we revealed [6], obligates signatory nations to fundamentally compromise their own sovereignty and to bring about widespread, permanent agricultural devastation. Instead of prohibiting “Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques”, as its title suggests, ENMOD obligates signatory nations to participate in unspecified “peaceful” environmental modification activities performed by unspecified entities, under unspecified circumstances, without limitation to harm. Whether harm is inflicted on a nation or a region’s agriculture, its environment, or on the health of its citizenry does not matter from ENMOD’s international legal point of view because its intent is “peaceful.” Nevertheless, large-scale environment modification cannot be construed as “peaceful.” Instead, it is fundamentally hostile as it damages Earth’s self-protective natural processes.
Please read more
