EmergencyLocal economyPanic 2020

Justices deny 2nd recusal demand so they can uphold Covid-19 overthrow

Without giving a reason, five justices of the Tennessee supreme court refuse to disqualify and recuse themselves from our case. My second recusal motion targeted in detail their membership in the Tennessee Bar Association, which favors globalism and “sustainable development” via the ABA delegates. (Photo David Tulis)

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Oct. 13, 2022 — The justices of the Tennessee supreme court reject a second motion to recuse and disqualify, insisting their membership in the Tennessee Bar is no source of bias and predjudice in a case that targets lawyerly favor for CV-19 emergency overthrow of the rule of law.

By David Tulis / NoogaRadio Network

The lawsuit to bring Tennessee into submission to Tenn. Code. Ann. 68-5-104 is being fought by bar members representing respondent Gov. Lee and a local official and also the court system itself that allied itself in fraud and breach of the law requiring a determination be made as to the agent of contagion for the so-called Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2, a patented coronavirus bioengineered to deliver more than just a flu or common cold.

Four judges at two levels have hog-tied the emergency case, and confronted with a second recusal demand, the justices deny that bar membership swings their vote in favor of the bioterror state created by Gov. Lee in an act that he admits lacks any legal basis or nonfraudulent exigency or lawful necessity.

Reject empowerment of proper plea

The lawsuit, filed more than 740 days ago in Hamilton County chancery court, empowers the judicial branch to force Gov. Lee and local official Becky Barnes to come into compliance with black-letter law. The petition to bring the court out of the court of appeals in Knoxville empowers the supreme court to halt a project that has killed an estimated 100,300 Tennesseans from an untested and experimental medical product.

The petition empowers the supreme court, too. The court is a victim of respondent-in-fraud Lee — misled by panic, by false advice from foreign jurisdictions, overrawed by media reports and overwhelming marketing propaganda from the drug industry aided by respondents; the court is either a victim, or the court is a Lee co-conspirator

One or the other. The Tennessee suprem court is either deceived or a knowing ally in the disaster, which the Republican governor launched 945 days ago, as highlighted in the ballooning record of this case.

Denial of relator’s most recent motions, like rejection of my Nov. 3, 2020, petition to invoke the supreme court’s supervisory and plenary certiorari powers over an errant chancery court, indicates the high court intends to not give the case a fair hearing.

The petition for certiorari and my original Oct. 2, 2020, petition poses a moral question of black and white, good and evil. It provokes inspection and action into antithesis, as opposed to the synthesis developed by respondents-in-fraud since March 2020, where the due process rights of relator and due process duties of respondents to have a nonfraudulent exigency for the use of police power are abrogated, where legal distinctions and necessities are blenderized into a mashup, vaporized.

A supreme court intending justice and the upholding of the Tennessee constitution and T.C.A. § 68-5-104 will use the case to bring relief to me and overthrow the criminal overthrow of state government the courts uphold to date over state of Tennessee’s objection.

Death toll at 999, then 1,003

As relator, I represent the state, and make demand that it’s law be upheld by state actors.

I have asked the court to take judicial notice of federal data regarding so-called vaccine injury from respondent-in-fraud Lee’s deadly legislating and rulemaking in favor of the experimental mRNA gene therapy injection program. As of Oct. 4, 2022, 999 reports of post-jab death have been filed with the federal government at VAERS, the vaccine adverse event reporting system. The data portal run by the FDA and the CDC (https://vaers.hhs.gov/index.html) registers 12,814 harmful jab reports in Tennessee. As of the weekend, the death toll is 1,003.

The underreporting factor rates a low 6.2x by the CDC, 41x by Steve Kirsch of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation and 100x by the Lazarus report from Harvard Pilgrim Health Care in 2009 that finds “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” 

That means 999 death reports implies a real toll between (a) 6,495 deaths (6.5x URF by CDC) and, (b) 99,900 deaths (100x URF by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care). The Kirsch calculation puts Tennessee deaths at 40,959

Fraud continues. Mass harm of incalculable scope continues. It’s time for the court system in Tennessee to step up, do its job and restore the division of power and limits on the executive branch that abrogated the people’s God-given rights.

Open misconduct

State law § 68-5-104 ordains five mandatory steps and one step ceding officials discretion. Respondents-in-fraud, and four judges below hearing this case, all disobey, and not administer and uphold the law, and hence violate the law, the subjects of the law (respondents) in open misconduct, the respondents act fraudulently, committing state felony oppression and felony official misconduct, in violation of relator’s state- and federal-guaranteed rights.

Respondents-in-fraud prior to suit have no evidence of compliance with the statute, and so make no determination as to the cause of the condition called Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2, and act without a warrant, without a nonfraudulent exigency or lawful cause, to the irreparable harm of petitioner state, and continuing lethal irreparable harm at work today, and certain to be operating tomorrow.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.