Tennessee law protects our rights. The operation of the law harms no one, according to a legal maxim. And the operation of law during times of sickness and contagion injures no one, either.
But if law is rejected, and its limits thrown down, disaster beckons, and today Tennessee is “reopening” and seeking to recover from an overthrow of law by Republicans and Democrats who operated a prison state from March 12, 2020, onward for a year, who overthrew man’s law and also God’s protections for the people pursuant to Romans 13 and other passages addressing the limits of kings and magistrates.
The Tennessee overthrow for “public health” was done without an isolate for the erstwhile SARS-CoV-2 or Covid-19. With no isolate, no scientist, medical director or governor can rightly fight the condition and its cause, can only guess how it harms people and spreads.
The lack of an isolate implies that so-called mitigation measures are “arbitrary and capricious,” violative of Americans’ basic right to be free from subjection to any such law, measure, policy or claim violating that standard.
The lack of an isolate is admitted in federal literature, buried amid pages of medicalese and bureaucratese.
By law in Tennessee, no mitigation can withstand constitutional scrutiny without their being a probable cause for that mitigation measure. And the mitigation measure upon an individual, when push comes to shove, must be epidemiological and provable in court.
The people’s grievance against the political and medical establishment is that they have imposed police power upon the healthy mass of people outside of law rather than focus police power (threat, coercion, prosecution, quarantine) on the suspected or known sick carrier of the condition. Such are the law’s limits in a free society. Coercive power works only upon those upon whom warrant, probable cause or court order operate.
No isolate for CV-19
The fact of the missing isolate is inconvenient, and the officials admit .
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
Hal Anthony, whose weekly webcast Back to the Woodshed has long covered the CV-19 shipwreck from a self-help legal perspective, says characterized stocks are constructed objects and models, not actual isolates subject to a real test. They are assumptions and creations, not actual physical objects of microscopic size.
The above is from an 80-page report, Page 42. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
Says Jon Rappoport, describing the problem in an October 2020 column,
If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.
This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.
“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.
The Smoking Gun: Where Is the Coronavirus? The CDC Says It Isn’t Available. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/10/jon-rappoport/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
The lawsuit vs. Gov. Bill Lee and Hamilton County health boss Becky Barnes highlights this lack of an isolate, required by state law.
Respondent(s) or department did not “take such steps as may be necessary to isolate or quarantine the case or premise upon which the case, cause or source may be found, as may be required by the rules and regulations of the state department of health,” and of the “contagious principle” or transmission mode and did not send its findings to the Commissioner or governor or any other government official, pursuant to either T.C.A. § 68-5-104 or T.C.A. § 68-1-202.
The suit cites the above quote.
The foreign subversive mitigation measures for “the virus” — for which “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available” — are weapons used against the people, not health crisis related. See, Pg. 38, C.D.C. 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Limit of Detection, effective 3/30/2020, at the time of respondent Lee’s originating order. And same title, Pg. 39, effective 07/13/2020.
Deadline for my brief in the court of appeals is July 26. The state of affairs in Tennessee is indeed sorry, with the court participating in the mass fraud, and court records indicating members of the supreme court will be unwilling to recuse themselves when my claims reach them.
Time to fight