From left, David Gerregano, commissioner of revenue; Brad Buchanan, administrative judge; Anne Warner, DOR attorney defending “The Guano”; and Camille Cline, Gerregano attornney.The mugshots of DOR victims are from Chattanoogan.com. (Photos DOR)
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Wednesday, March 12, 2025 – Brad Buchanan is the head hearing officer at the department of revenue in Nashville. He is a company man and proves it over 62 pages in an order denying me relief for revocation of my Honda Odyssey minivan.
On March 3 I gave the commissioner of revenue an appeal to overrule Mr. Buchanan’s initial order.
He says a one-sentence addition to the financial responsibility law taking effect in 2002 created “a departure from the after-accident regime” we are defending and that the Atwood law and the EIVS surveillance system “create [an] independent and parallel suspension/revocation process,” and that it doesn’t matter that the 29 abrogations of law occur under revenue department policy of forcing all motorists to buy insurance if they don’t have $65,000 or don’t want to be criminally charged.
In 15 seconds I was able to discern whether or not it is a good opinion.
And that was by doing a search on the word certified or certification. He uses neither word, indicating that he does not deal with the key issue in rebuffing my attack on the “Eye of Sauron.”
“It is sufficient to my ruling that the statutes on which the department relies *** to suspend petitioner’s registration operate together in para materia without conflict and expressly authorize the department to take the action it took. *** I conclude that they do.”
Using context to determine meaning of law
The phrase in pari materia is a key phrase for us because it is the doctrine that a body of law must be read as awhole, and that the entirety of a law provides context for the meaning of all its parts. The “good people” cannot rely on that doctrine to describe their policy. It describes only my analysis in my litigation to overturn Sauron.
In pari materia is how we’re supposed to read God’s word. One part interprets any other part. Every heresy involves magnifying one part and abrogating or deleting other parts of the Word.
The key issue in the case is that the department requires people to buy regular operator and owner’s policies as “proof of financial responsibility.” The law, in contrast, deals solely with what are called certified motor vehicle liability policies that have a special set of characteristics.
The certified policies are endorsed, approved, bear the imprimatur of the state and the insurance licensed carrier and come at a higher premium than regular policies.
The Tennessee financial responsibility law deals only with people who have suspended licenses and who have restored the privilege on condition of having a motor vehicle liability policy, as it is defined in TCA 55-12-102 the program stripmines the public for the benefit of insurance companies, probably to the tune of F$2 billion a year in free premiums for the approved 350 carriers involved in the scam. That’s to say, every insurance company licensed to sell auto policies in Tennessee.
There is no way any Christian can consider this program and my effort to beat it without having the greatest sense of anger at its poisonous effects across our state. Christians should be supporting what I’m doing, feeling God’s hatred against these wicked administrators, and supporting people like me.
The gnomes with whom I make this combat are deserving of our prayers, too, and our many thanks.
