I counterattack vs. loan shark industry in Tennessee by defending a suit by Flexibility Capital, a so-called business funder or buyer of future receivables in a Nov. 14, 2023, hearing before the court of appeals in Knoxville. Flexibility is represented by Mary Cheadle of Nashville, ignoring most of my claims about fraud in the contract, fraud on the court and fraud by a member of the bar.
Mary Cheadle dismisses my “no subject jurisdiction for unconscionable contract” claim by saying my notice of appeal is untimely.
Related posts:
4 conditions that will make public schools in Chattanooga less tenable
Airbnb ban illegal, but it tells of government efficiency
Red Bank police chief refuses to meet over violence, profanity
Side by side: building new economy without waiting for old to collapse
‘Driving on revoked’ defendant Parker faces hearing over scope of law
Gate, ‘private property’ sign thwart city ‘inspection’ of house
How administrative notice intends to overturn police traffic abuse
Basis of rebuilding local economy: Local agriculture
Wamp backs entrepreneurship — but of the governmental variety
To become great, city must slash official violence
That’s all Chattanooga needs — more ‘overarching leadership’
Sideways chicken bone in Mayor Berke's throat
Roddy’s 1st temptation: Re-militarization of police under Trump
City’s prospects will brighten as debt paid down, & tithing, giving increase
UnifiEd dreams of education world only free market can create
It sounds like the so-called contract is “void ab initio” due to fraud in the inducement to enter a contract. Fraud (non-disclosure) vitiates the most solemn of contracts.
Should be easy to get the judges on board with that Maxim of Law.