I counterattack vs. loan shark industry in Tennessee by defending a suit by Flexibility Capital, a so-called business funder or buyer of future receivables in a Nov. 14, 2023, hearing before the court of appeals in Knoxville. Flexibility is represented by Mary Cheadle of Nashville, ignoring most of my claims about fraud in the contract, fraud on the court and fraud by a member of the bar.
Mary Cheadle dismisses my “no subject jurisdiction for unconscionable contract” claim by saying my notice of appeal is untimely.
Related posts:
‘Driving on revoked’ defendant Parker faces hearing over scope of law
Pinkston gets copy of administrative notice; will officers be notified?
Engineer wants to build larger net by which to trap Tennesseans
Marceaux cases would stymie ‘police state’ enforcement in all TN cities
County sues Ed’s Supply over masks, in fight with empty gun, dirty hands
Bottom-up reform concept sees how human society works
‘Buying time’ doesn’t fix financial crises; it makes the next ones worse
Am I cutting weeds at the top?
Mott urges city council collect millions in UTC debt
County’s biggest business: School system with $416 million budget
Accused not ‘served’ sworn warrant; must go to court to get it
Demand for justice blows up in TN mandamus case filing
Gentry confronts web of lawyerly indirection in fight for citizens’ rights in Nashville
Hamilton County indicts tradesman Parker for use of roads
Blacks in Chattanooga oppressed 10x
It sounds like the so-called contract is “void ab initio” due to fraud in the inducement to enter a contract. Fraud (non-disclosure) vitiates the most solemn of contracts.
Should be easy to get the judges on board with that Maxim of Law.