Parker asserts right of communication, liberty under organic law

The ordeal of Gregory Parker of Rossville, Ga., is remarkable for the fortitude of Sheriff Steve Wilson and his deputies to impose the commercial motor vehicle statute upon Mr. Parker, 36, a tradesman, despite this commoner’s insistence that he is not using the public right of way and the freeways in the state of Georgia for commercial purposes under privilege.

Such arguments, however, go nowhere in court. To throw off accusations there, the accused must squarely place the entire burden of proof and of authority on his accusers by the proper line of questioning as to their evidence and their law. These, usually, are sorely lacking.

To overturn the system of oppression beleaguering Mr. Parker and his family, one must reframe one’s position in a series of interrogatories on the witness stand at trial.

By David Tulis / NoogaRadio 92.7 FM

On Saturday Mr. Parker was arrested at his house, no warrant shown, taken to the jail, strip searched and held under seizure more than four hours. The pretext for the search of his house was the smell of marijuana alleged to be floating in the air.

His house was ransacked by as many as eight deputies, according to an interview with Mr. Parker and his wife, Kasee. Mr. Parker, in the vein of colonial common law lawyers and citizens, asserts his organic rights in an affidavit that he says was served on Sheriff Wilson and deputies in November 2019.

This document filed among Tennessee officials is the same as that filed with Sheriff Wilson, except for some details. It may seem a bit technical, but gives Mr. Parker’s reasonings as to his claim to be a free citizen in the state of Georgia, and under a liberation into the present day from the date of the signing of the state and federal constitutions that he believes are alive and well today, securing property, enhancing prosperity.

Affidavit of Gregory Parker

I have researched extensively the organic laws of the united states of America, including two hundred years of American case law (i.e., Common law), and affirm that I have secured the UNALIENABLE and FUNDAMENTAL, UNRESTRICTED and UNREGULATED RIGHT TO TRAVEL upon both the public walkways and the highways, and transport my personal and allodial property, duly conveyed, unhindered by ANY private, corporate or statutory law, or Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) regulation or socalled requirement.

This unalienable right to travel is guaranteed by the 9th & 10th Amendments of the organic Constitution for the united states of America and Bill of Rights, and upheld by many court decisions in support of that right. I now explicitly RESERVE, ASSERT and DEFEND that right.

This AFFIDAVIT is submitted upon demand of a driver’s license, registration or proof of insurance as part of the official record of ANY ensuing action and must be introduced as evidence in said action.

That I, Gregory Justin Parker, do NOT under ANY circumstances utilize the public highways for commercial purposes. I am NOT a 14th Amendment legal “person” engaged in interstate commerce, nor do I derive income from the travel and transport of goods. I am NOT a “driver,” nor am I an “operator” of a “motor vehicle.”

The driver’s license is for motor vehicles involved in commerce only. My private, self-propelled contrivance/carriage is NOT involved in commerce, therefore, it is NOT a “motor vehicle.” The corporate State of Tennessee Department of Motor Vehicle code does not disclose the true intent and purpose of the statutes, though a “motor vehicle” is adequately and clearly defined in the United States Code (USC).

“Motor Vehicle means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes.”—18 USC 31

“Motor Vehicle means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes.”—18 USC 31

“The privilege of using the streets and highways by the operation thereon of motor carriers for hire can be acquired only by permission or license from the state or its political subdivision.”—Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th ed, page 830                                                                                                                                                

I cannot in good faith apply for and accept a driver’s license, as I would be committing PERJURY. I would have to SWEAR under OATH that I am a member of, citizen of, franchisee of, or resident (agent) of [fiduciary, surety for] the corporate “State of ” Tennessee, when the already established facts by affidavit have evidenced that I am NOT a member of, citizen of, franchisee of, or resident (agent) of the corporate “State of “Tennessee or the federal United States.

I am NOT effectively connected with a trade or business in the corporate monopoly of the United States government, whether federal, State, county or Municipal. I am NOT a resident “U.S. citizen,” but a Citizen of the several States domiciled in the sovereign state of Tennessee republic 1850, an American state Citizen of the united states of America. I am domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction to both the corporate state and federal governments. I have NOT knowingly or willingly waived ANY of my UNALIENABLE RIGHTS. American case law has clearly adjudicated that:

“The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his/her property thereon either by carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city [or State] may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he/she has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” —Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579

“Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his/her property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience.”[“regulated” means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, signs etc.]—Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 22

Therefore, I have determined and hereby affirm by AFFIDAVIT and under oath, by virtue of my declared sovereign state Citizenship and American case law, that I am NOT required to have government permission to travel, NOT required to have a driver’s license, NOT required to have vehicle registration of my personal property, nor to surrender the lawful title of my duly conveyed property to the State as security against government indebtedness and the undeclared federal bankruptcy. ANY administrative rule, regulation or statutory act of ANY State legislature or judicial tribunal to the contrary is unlawful and clearly unconstitutional, thus NULL and VOID. American case law has clearly adjudicated that:

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”—Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S.

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”—Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights.” —Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945

ANY action involving a citation or ticket issued, confiscation, impoundment or search and seizure of my private property by a police officer or ANY other public servant or employee that carries a fine or jail time is a penalty or sanction, thus converting a right into a crime. ANY citation or ticket is thus NULL and VOID. Under every circumstance without exception, government officials must hold the Constitution for the united states of America (1791) supreme over ANY other laws, regulations or orders. Every police (executive) officer or judicial officer has SWORN AN OATH an oath to protect the lives, property and rights of the citizens of the united states of America under the supreme law of the land. ANY act to deprive state Citizens of their constitutionally protected rights is a direct violation of their oath of office, a felony and a federal crime.

” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several state Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;” — Constitution for the united states of America, Article 6

” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several state Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;” — Constitution for the united states of America, Article 6

ANY action by a police (i.e., executive) officer, officer of the court, public servant or government official to assert unlawful authority under the “color of law” will be construed as a direct and willful violation of my constitutionally protected rights, and will be prosecuted to the full extent of American law.

“Public officials are not immune from suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading constitutional rights.”—AFLCIO v. Woodward, 406 F2d 137 t.

“Whoever under the color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any state, Territory, or District to the deprivation of ANY rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution of laws of the United States…shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both…”—18 USC 242

This AFFIDAVIT also certifies that the I have previously completed and passed a test measuring my competency to safely control a motorized vehicle upon the public highways within the united states of America. I have also met or exceeded all common sense requirements concerning the “rules of the road” and the ability to maneuver a motorized vehicle in a safe and responsible manner.