Judge Waverly Crenshaw is overseeing our suit to end an industrial-scale fraud run out of two state government offices in Tennessee. (Photo Nashville Bar Assn. interview on YouTube)
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Wednesday, December 25, 2024 — A federal judge is denying my motion for preliminary injunction against “the Guano,” but this Christmas week I’m planning to take a automobile trip to Nashville to file the necessary affidavit that’s missing.
Since I do not have electronic filing privileges, the only way to get a perfected injunction claim into the case is to hand deliver a missing affidavit to the clerk of court, Lynda Hill, at the gargantuan and opulent federal courthouse in Nashville.
God in his Providence is giving me the sense of urgency to file this document immediately. On Christmas eve I was planning to travel there from Soddy-Daisy — but, alas, it was a holiday and every establishment was closed.
I awoke at 3:15 a.m. with the sense of urgency in the federal case against the fraudulent operation under color of the Tennessee financial responsibility law of 1977. I got to work on the document.
Judge Crenshaw explains what I did wrong, and says I can fix it.
Here, although Plaintiff appears to have complied with the other requirements, Plaintiff has not explained in writing what particular efforts he made to give notice to Defendants or why notice should not be required prior to seeking emergency injunctive relief. As noted above, this district requires “strict compliance” with the notice provision by pro se parties such as Plaintiff. Thus, Plaintiff has not placed specific facts before the Court in a manner allowing it to fairly evaluate his motion seeking immediate emergency relief on the merits. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. No. 8). The denial is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability to file a procedurally compliant motion, if appropriate.
Notice that he says Ihave to “[place] specific facts” before the court, and that I can try it again “if appropriate.”
This Page 1 of a 3-page order by Waverly Crenshaw contains a rebuttal presumption about whom the TFRL makes liable. Do you see it? “This case concerns the authority of the Commissioner to administer the Electronic Insurance Verification Program (the “EIVP”) to ensure that the owners of motor vehicles registered in Tennessee are complying with the state’s financial responsibility laws.” Drop in a comment.
Of course, it is appropriate, for God’s glory and man’s benefit as I use my unique position for my calling to serve the kingdom of God (“And the crowd sought Him and came to Him, and tried to keep Him from leaving them; but He said to them, ‘I must preach the kingdom of God to the other cities also, because for this purpose I have been sent.’” Luke 4 42, 43).
And also, on Tuesday, I had on my desk a fresh filing for the McMinn County chancery court. I am suing The Guano in state court, per my right of petition under promise that Tennessee courts are open. In the three-judge anti-corruption panel, a first judge has been assigned, Jerri Bryant of McMinn County. In the state action, I sue revenue and also Jeff Long, commissioner of safety, who runs several frauds against the public. The thing to bring to Chancellor Bryant’s attention: No answer from respondents for 50 days. The rules allow 30.
Guano case link to Crenshaw order on injunction
David runs a personal nonprofit fighting and mercy ministry. He thanks you for checks sent directly to c/o 10520 Brickhill Lane, Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379. Also, in GiveSendGo
