data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd464/bd464ad30257bec872a82f82a064c6fc29dd0094" alt=""
Chattanooga police traffic accident investigators, from left, Capt. Heather Williams, MPO Adam Cavitt, investigator Marvin Perez, Sgt. Tommy Seiter, Sgt. Chris Mullinix receive notes of thanks. (Photo CPD)
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Monday, Feb. 10, 2025 — If ordinary people like you are going to defy the police state in Tennessee and thwart its cops and deputies in pernicious prosecution, you’re gonna want to set the baseline of the law before any encounter.
That’s what I have done — write legal notices to put local public servants on awares, and provide a basis for denying them qualified immunity when they act apart from the law and face my lawsuit. The fact of notice, or so I claim, is the basis for defeating qualified immunity, which spares cops any duty to make redress for false imprisonment and false arrest. My federal case seeks to bypass qualified immunity claims are grounds that the law at issue is “well established,” and that by articulate administrative notice to public entities and public servants.
Before I filed my reform lawsuit against Sheriff AustinGarrett and the county against extraorinary and illegal arrest practices, I put the government on notice.
I served the county my “Administrative notice on limits of arrest power in Tennessee under ‘public offense’ rule.” In 2018 I’d served the county and the sheriff my Tennessee transportation administrative, a public document that reqires the county to respect the exercise of constitutional rights as regards the public right of way and public roads.
Here are two notices. The first is notice on arrest warrant requirements. The second notice is on “ingress-egress” rights. Does that sound obscure? Shouldn’t be. Your right of free movement on the public roads is premised on the land itself, your right to leave your abode and to return to it unobstructed by any public or private party.
Administrative notice on limits of arrest power in Tennessee under ‘public offense’ rule
Sheriff Garret disbelieves in constitutionally guaranteed liberty in use of the public roads. In his mind, no one may use the roadway freely, but only in commerce. Therefore, no one may “travel” or exercise the right of ingress-egress from one’s abode. The ingress-egress notice below has been served on state of Tennessee, the department of revenue, and city of Chattanooga. It intends to make public servants aware of their authority, and its limits. Notice links to each of these affidavits. Until we use this sort of material, we cannot bring to a halt the continuing harm of police abuse and false imprisonment and false arrest.
Economic development and such topics are merely noise and distraction until local govenment here in the Chattanooga area, an across the state, don’t take time to read the controlling law.
Ingress-egress administrative notice
Since I have two revoked tags in my fight with Cmsr. David Gerregano to halt the “Eye of Sauron” surveillance program creating 40,8000 illegal criminal convictions a year, I expect any day to be arrested by a Chattanooga city police officer. City cops are on notice about limits in their authority, and my rights. The corporation is aware of the constitution, and of the limits in administrative authority that cops exercise criminally, with their criminal authority, otherwise lawfully exerciseable. If he or she arrests me, the city is committing that harm knowing and intending to commit it, against law, and maliciously.
David runs a personal nonprofit fighting and mercy ministry. He thanks you for checks sent directly to c/o 10520 Brickhill Lane, Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379. Also at GiveSendGo.