Note No. 4, the legal version of “free will” exercised by Tennessee revenue boss David Gerregano: “arbitrary and capricious.” These lines refer to the standards of review in the TN uniform administrative procedures act. (Photo David Tulis)
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Saturday, Dec. 7, 2024 — The Guano gets his ideas about ignoring man’s laws from us churchgoing Christians who ignore God’s laws.
He’s absorbed our weak Christian culture, our civil religion-type Christianity with no personal God, no sovereign God, and no personal accountability for God’s law whether in public office or in private life as husband, dad or lover.
David Gerregano runs a tax policy that ignores most of the Tennessee financial responsibility act of 1977. (Photo TN department of revenue)
What I’m saying is, David Gerregano, Tennessee commissioner of revenue, believes he can ignore clear law regarding the administration of the Tennessee financial responsibility after 1977.
He gets that power to ignore T.C.A. § 55-12-201 et seq because he probably learned in it church, if he goes or is a member. Clear commands can be ignored if we feel like it. We’re not really bound by law — ostensibly in the age of grace and free will.
Free will and what it means
His free will, as a matter of law, is called acts “arbitrary and capricious.”
I’m suing him in an administrative agency case for fraud, for enforcing the law as if Tennessee were a mandatory insurance state. I am suing him because he requires members of the public to buy ordinary operator’s and owner’s policies, which in no way meet the legal standard for “proof of financial responsibility” in the law. Only certified policies meet that standard. Only people on conditional use of the privilege have to buy certified policies, and insurance companies will sell certified policies only to them.
Mr. Gerregano’s attorney, Camille Cline, who speaks for him, says we are not an insurance state mandatory because the members of the public have a choice. They can either buy insurance from one of the 350 approved providers, or they can give the commissioner safety or the commissioner revenue, a $65,000 check.
The commissioner revenue has no authority to cash or receive such a check, but he admits to having received a $65,000 check payable to DOR though only the commissioner of safety under the law is allowed to receive checks or bond payments following a qualifying accident.
Qualifying accident is important detail in this story because a person not otherwise under suspended license or tag does not become subject to any duty under the TFRL until there is a “qualifying accident,” until the echo from the crashed stop bouncing among the buildings and the whirring sound of the hubcap pirouetting on the pavement stops and the hubcap comes to a rest.
The commissioner of revenue believes that he can ignore the clear intent of the law with its 57 provisions and run an industry capture program that guarantees as much as F$2 billion in free premiums to the insurance companies that are his stakeholders, friends, allies, and cooperators.
The commissioner uses what I call in legal filings “the Eye of Sauron.” His EIVS surveillance eyeball burning down over the landscape in Tennessee, sending out stinger notices to anyone who does not have insurance connected with his tag which is connected to his VIN, his vehicle identification number period
My administrative case is for revocation of my 2000 Honda Odyssey minivan tag. My secoIn this case, the VIN that gives me standing instead of my Honda Odyssey minivan, year 2000, I forced the commissioner to revoke my tag by not paying for insurance which forced him under his protocols to revoke my registration period
Disobedience to law
The commissioner’s disobedience to the law that he swears to uphold is like that of Christians who reject God’s clear commands in the details and in the particular.
Christians may say they believe in the 10 commandments as a rule for righteousness. They say they believe that they apply to them and to our city, county, state and republic. But we have not studied the public policy parts of the Bible, namely the Old Testament, where the rules of justice and equity are put into detail.
➤ “Do not remove the ancient landmark, Nor enter the fields of the fatherless” Proverbs 23:10
➤ “You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality, nor take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous.” Deuteronomy 16:19
➤ “And they shall eat the increase of your livestock and the produce of your land, until you are destroyed; they shall not leave you grain or new wine or oil, or the increase of your cattle or the offspring of your flocks, until they have destroyed you.” Deuteronomy 28:51
Our country is under a comprehensive judgment because Christian people in a comprehensive disobedience have rejected God’s clear signals for sin on many points. American Christianity is antinomian, subjectivized, privatized, hyper-individualized, non-kingdom oriented, exhibiting lack of faith in God and his word.
While our country is in this comprehensive judgment for its comprehensive rejection of God’s particulars, I am in a court case that has been going on since July 26, 2023, when I filed for contested case regarding illegal revocation of a minivan tag, preventing me from using my property in commerce, and subjecting me to arrest and jailing.
I am suing the commissioner personally and in his office in a federal case. The federal case is over a second car, as is a third case in the state three-judge panel. That second car is my 1999 Toyota RAV4, VIN JT3GP10V4X7044214, plate no. 639BKTV. He intends to revoke it Dec. 27, 2024.
The midnight ding-dong of revocation, like in the Cinderella tale, converts my motor vehicle back into a pumpkin. That being, a regular ole automobile, useable only or private travel.
Can others add their name to your lawsuit? I might like to join you in your fight for liberty. It is unconstitutional, is it not, to compel citizens to buy something (insurance?) in order to exercise a natural right?
Yours under the mercy (of God),
T.