Yes, global warming is occurring, but not because of you burn an internal combustion engine in your car. Behind global warming, bizarre weather patterns and massive neurological toxicity in Western populations is skystriping, the primary method used to reduce sunlight on the earth’s surface. Environmentalist researcher Dane Wigington outlines the public policy goals of climate engineering, another high-handed government intervention for our good. I recommend. 46 minutes.
Jets are busily protecting us from the evil of direct sunlight by laying down a weather pattern we might call “partially sunny.” Soddy-Daisy, April 21, 2014.
Another day busy with flyovers, April 24, I shoot this image off Highway 27 showing how skystripes turn into cloud cover. But why at the end of the day, when the sun recedes?
By David Tulis
Geoengineering is altering of weather patterns to reduce the sun’s rays upon the earth’s surface. The programs have been ramped up under President Obama, and reportedly have reduced by 20 percent the energy and light from that life-giving orb. They are programs overseen by government and served by business combines such as Raytheon and Pratt & Whitney, the maker of engines, and by universities and taxpayer-supported entities.
Most interesting to me is the suggestion that geoengineering doesn’t exist as a science backed by at least 150 federal patents, and that the sky striping activities over Chattanooga are mere contrails — the result of old-fashioned jet engines burning through damp, cold air.
In ordinary parlance, global warming deniers are those who deny global warming is a naturally occurring phenomenon requiring the shutdown of industry and slashing of human populations. Another kind of denier exists: The one who denies that mankind is altering weather by deliberate program.
I am a free market and Christian skeptic of the power of civil authority to deliver much good to the people. I believe in the law of God as a standard for social order and the basis of any legal system that exists to oppress the evildoer and defend the innocent in his liberty. So civil government has a role in the created order — namely to suppress sin.
But civil power, in the era of the nation-state, has gone well beyond operating courts and raising armies in time of external threat. The nation-state and its supporters have clambered into the seat of God’s creation itself to rearrange creation for their own purposes. Genetic engineering. Social engineering. Scientific management of populations. Eugenics. Wealth by credit creation. The innovations are unceasing and marvelous in our eyes.
Geoengineering faces people skeptical that it exists. But my cursory review into the question, thanks to environmentalists such as Dane Wigington, indicates weather modification is too well established to waste much time arguing over its primary evidence. That evidence is sky striping by jet planes, streaming aerosolized metal and other particulates into the sky. This form of official pollution is poured forth for the benefit of all, to the detriment of a few. Just as public health cares nothing for the individual, only the mass of people, geoengineering will readily sacrifice individuals with compromised health if the planet can be saved from a meltdown.
But I underestimate its effects. Says Mr. Wigington: “Global climate engineering/geoengineering programs are radically disrupting weather patterns, disrupting the hydrological cycle (causing drought in some areas, flooding others), destroying the ozone layer, and contaminating the entire planet with the toxic fallout from these atmospheric spraying operations. Climate engineering programs have been fully deployed for many years. There is a mountain of hard science data and film footage to back up this statement of fact.”
My petty local economy apprehension
I work as an independent Chattanooga journalist to explore how an average American city can deal with the day’s financial and moral meltdown. This Southern city, blessed by influence of the gospel, has means among its people to react positively to the breakup of national statist cartels such as public school, public health and “national” currency (the Federal Reserve note, dare I say it, is private money) everyone by law is forced to use. My work is to be positive by highlighting the origin of solutions to the crisis. These solutions are biblical, free market-oriented, personal, doable. They will work as public order shatters and despair becomes widespread.
I don’t want geoengineering to distract you. Nor me. As Mr. Wigington says, geoengineering becomes an all-absorbing topic, one under which all others shrink in significance. I am tempted to throw myself into it. My recent essay about it has drawn several people to read it — more than 5x normal traffic. But covering the topic serves you less than I am serving you now. In its grand international scale, sky striping would focus your attention on a problem we cannot solve and whose effects — metal toxicity, ill health — we cannot combat.
I hope a good local man will make a second career exposing geoengineering insofar as it affects Hamilton County. This human activity is the greatest threat to public health today, I suspect, and big business and big government are its patrons. A great story. A great place in which to exercise the rights of a free press. A third of older people die with dementia. A new thing. How? Why? In my work serving you, climate engineering is an ever-present background evil against which we act in faith, hope, love and charity toward our neighbor, regardless of whether artificial clouds and metallicized food supplies ultimately prove benign.
Though scientists say chemtrailing is cheap, geoengineering is a phenomenon of the total state for which cost is no object. Its origins are in war, specifically the U.S. invasion of Vietnam. Among Americans, warfare traipses easily across every field — our war on poverty, war on financial crime, war on cash, war on drugs. Mr. Wigington explains that climate engineering operates on a pragmatic moral basis against which science itself is rising in revolt. Please listen to his lecture nearby and a discussion of unintended “feedback loops.”
Tell you what, if you want to explore geoengineering over Chattanooga, I’ll help you. Just call me. Meet me Friday at Panera Posse and I’ll buy you breakfast. I’ll do everything to help you get a website going — one more arm of the free press in the great state of Tennessee.
The skies over Hixson, a part of Chattanooga, April 2, 2014. Did you notice roughly when Chattanooga skies started looking this way as a matter of unnoticed routine? President Obama has stepped up chemtrailing to save the planet.
Heavy aluminum days, such as this one April 17, 2014, opening up to me from my back yard in Soddy-Daisy, often begin with sunrise overflights. I am trying to have a thankful spirit — and to breathe deeply the spirit of confidence — as I consider the blessings of being an American.
Under a heavy skystriping operation April 21, 2014, Floyd’s hardware store in Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., tries to prosper in the sunlight of a local economy free market.
You can learn more
The list below has been developed by Mr. Wigington
If you’re concerned, click http://www.skyderalert.com/ to view the trailer of “Look Up,” a newly released, award winning documentary, narrated by William Baldwin. It is an excellent introduction to climate engineering and geoengineering. We have included articles and information that will shine more light on this extremely important issue, one that is radically affecting our planet’s life support systems, and every one of us. Our only goal is that you will review what we have included, and we hope it will motivate your continued investigation of the completely illegal, unregulated, and incredibly devastating climate modification programs that are being conducted on a global scale.
A highly developed website focusing on climate management and its perils: www.geoengineeringwatch.org www.skyderalert.com
“Climate Engineering, Weather Warfare…” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yZhh2leRJA
“The Most Important Topic of Our Time” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2x6TEeknfo
“Look Up” Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1TRQpJrYmU&feature=youtu.be
A slide show of what is happening to our world: http://worldviewclimateengineering.weebly.com/
Aren’t they just contrails? No. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgL6b7VTxT4#t=1342
You can find more documents and many pictures on these links:
Wonderfest 2010, discussing solar radiation management. Select 08 below video. http://tinyurl.com/oyd84v3
Global Research article: http://tinyurl.com/bxy5yqy
Monsanto Buys Climate Corporation http://rt.com/news/monsanto-buy-climate-corporation-687/
Council on Foreign Relations article: “The Truth About Geoengineering” http://tinyurl.com/n6x8va6
But is it really sulphurs they’re talking about using? What about aluminum? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmGRy_cCiZw&feature=youtu.be
Why would aluminum be a problem? http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/al.htm (and it can never be removed from our soil.)
What about DROUGHT? Could geoengineering be affecting the hydrological cycle? Yes: http://www.edf.org/blog/2013/12/11/geoengineering-cure-worse-disease.
Still not convinced weather modification is taking place or has been used in the past? Click on the links below.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/popeye.htm
93rd Annual American Meteorological Conference, January 2013. See page 6, section 2.6, “Seeding of Cirrus Clouds to Reduce Global Warming.” http://tinyurl.com/lqhu7ql.
Weather Modification Inc. www.weathermodification.com (They see “potential”. We’re
concerned about that.)
North American Weather Modification Council www.nawmc.org (We’re concerned about this, too.)
These clips show a jet turning off spray nozzles, strongly suggesting, as do many other such records, that spray planes are not innocent passenger jets leaving an old-fashioned contrail of water vapor. One simply has to laugh at denials of such benevolent and useful programs intended for the public welfare.
Source: Dane Wigington operates geoengineeringwatch.com and has amassed a great deal of information about cloud-seeding and weather modification programs.
What makes you think that they are something other than persistent contrails?
David, when it’s cold outside, like it is in the Earth’s upper atmosphere, can’t you see your breath when you talk? It’s water vapor hanging in the air, just like the warmer air from plane engines hangs in the upper atmosphere, causing “stripes” behind the airplane engines.
Some may say the condensation coming from your mouth in the cold and hanging in the warmer air is “poison,” but someone who is a scientist, or who understands science would point out that the vapor itself is not poison, but just warmer air, thus visible, and hanging in suspension because it’s lighter than the cooler air around it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrail
David, thanks for your courteous reply via email. You said, “Do you think I suppose these stripes are mere contrails? Persistent contrails implies they are deliberate, policy-sourced leavings. That is what I think these phenomena to be. Please clarify your comment and resubmit.” I will do so.
The primary claim behind the version of the “chemtrails” idea promoted by Dane Wigington and others is that ordinary contrails (caused by jet engine exhaust) can’t persist for long periods, and therefore any trails that do persist must be the result of intentional “spraying.”
But that claim is provably false. Contrails can dissipate quickly, or they can persist for hours, depending on the atmospheric conditions that the plane is traveling through. This has been well-documented (in pictures, films, books, even articles the scientific literature) for as long as there’s been high-altitude air travel, going back to the WWII era and even a bit before.
The images being called “chemtrails” by Wigington and others look exactly like images of persistent contrails from several decades ago. Thus, my question: what makes you think they are something else?
Sister & Facebook friend, do you suppose that every long white stripe is a contrail? Do you suppose it hasn’t entered the minds of intelligent people to regulate the weather by altering the composition of the atmosphere with persistent ingredients to bring about a desired result?
We have heard for 20 years about global warming, and those who believe in global warming have gotten shrill about need to do something about the problem.
Do you suppose nothing is being done aside from trying to pass a carbon credits bill in congress?
Oh you of little faith. Oh you, a climate change denier! Oh, you, lacking faith in your government, your blessings under our corporate state! Oh, sister, to think that you believe geoengineering hasn’t been contemplated by good people, and put into action!
From where does your skeptical spirit arise? Why the doubt about their competency, the power of their patents, their engineering, their mechanics, the perfected compositions of materiel by which clouds are created, spread, generalized, all to the effect of dimming the sun, that malefactor and destroyer of our planet?
Why so little confidence in our environmental movement, which for furtherance of its goals has been taken over by Uncle Sam? Why not a spirit of gladness and thankfulness that something is being done HERE in little ole Chattanooga?
No, we have not been forgotten. We are cared for by those who matter. They will not let us go without medical health insurance coverage, nor without cloud coverage.
David, you seem to be admonishing others to believe in the chemtrails idea based on “faith” (in what the government would do). That rhetorical approach makes sense when giving a religious sermon, but when it comes to matters of the physical world, I think that most reasonable people prefer conclusions based on evidence.
Thank you for visiting my website and leaving a comment. It is gracioius of you to have done so — twice.
Indeed, religious exhortation is not the basis upon which one should try to convince another person that a particular American industry exists. I wouldn’t evoke the name of God to argue that the food coaching industry exists. I would simply turn to today’s North Hamilton Weekly Community News, p. 8, to learn about it from a representative.
But resistance to believing in the existence of a powerful and influential American (international, really) industry of climate control is, perhaps, religious and philosophical. And that is what my comment above to my Facebook friend addresses. People can’t see contrails as chemtrails because it doesn’t fit their ideas of the way things are or should be.
The post above, with its outbound links, seeks to convince people that contrails are aerosolized aluminum deposit “chemtrails” because an entire industrial and government complex, built on dozens of patents, undergirds the operation.
My argument is to suggest that there is probable cause for chemtrailing to exist, motivation of all important actors, and technical innovation over the years to enable climate change to be not just prospective, but actual.
Mr. Wigington has a tough battle to convince people that chemtrailing is happening, and that its role as officially approved pollution is hazardous to your health. He is battling a blindness created by official media that works on the minds and hearts of the people, altering vocabulary, altering their field of view. And the people have an instinctive trust in the state, which is a holding in religion. By these two methods great facts are kept in the field of speculation, “conspiracy theory” and anti-government propaganda.
My arguments are premised on the fact base of geoengineering. In defending the evidence from the skeptic, it behooves me to address the purported benevolence and divinity of the nation-state and to disrobe it of a heavenly garb.
The trouble is that there is no actual “fact base” for the claim that there is a current, on-going geoengineering program. It’s something that has been proposed, discussed, and studied for the future, but there is no evidence that it is happening now. It’s not about blind faith, it’s about claims that are either unsupported or falsified by reliable evidence.
Generally, Wigington and others do as you have essentially done, just point to the trails and say, “There’s the evidence, how can you deny it?” But the trails appear in every way to be persistent contrails. You’re placing the “denier” label incorrectly; Wigington denies all of the well-established documentation and science about contrail formation and persistence in order to maintain his beliefs.
To call every white stripe in the sky a contrail denies the existence of an entire science and an entire industry. It says men do not throw, spray or otherwise disseminate anything from aircraft aloft, that they perhaps haven’t figured out they may do such a thing. The denier position presupposes that an entire academic and scientific field doesn’t exist, and that all its programs are mere speculation and futurity, a dream of the futurist. My and Mr. Wigington’s outbound links serve the purpose of allowing open-minded people to look for themselves.
Just because it’s on the Internet doesn’t mean it’s false, Belfrey. One ought to evaluate data such as I’ve presented, with Mr. Wigington’s aid, and not dismiss it because it doesn’t fit our preconceptions.
Science has gone much further than you think. Environmentalists need to unite to question the program — once again, a big industry and big government program. Our suspicions deserve to be aroused. Please give a little time to Mr. Wigington’s lecture at the top of this file. I’d appreciate it very much.
Geoengineering as an academic field certainly exists, David. But not a single qualified scientist in that field (nor in meteorology, atmospheric physics, etc.) says that there is a current, ongoing SRM program as claimed by “chemtrails” believers. Can you find a single scholarly source which supports that claim? The science is about geoengineering techniques which are proposed and studied for the future.
Can you give a specific example of “data” in support of Wigington’s claims, which you think I should consider? Other than his provably false claim that contrails always dissipate quickly?