1. Standing to sue, failure to acknowledge existing material facts The orders of the court held by Hamilton County chancery court judge assert relator has no standing to sue and such claim is reviewable by the court of appeals without a presumption of correctness. It is well recognized that a party must show three “indispensable elements” to establish constitutional standing: (1) a distinct and palpable injury, as opposed to a conjectural or hypothetical injury; (2) a causal connection between the claimed injury and the challenged conduct; and (3) the alleged injury is capable of being redressed by a favorable decision … Continue reading Does this man have ‘standing’ to fight for you in TN courts?