In CV-19 ‘crisis,’ does Barnes have discretion to obey law? Or does she have to obey law?
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Feb. 22 — The court says state of Tennessee on relation is due no relief for harms admitted done because relator has no right by which he can claim a duty on the part of respondent Barnes to deliver honest government services. By David Tulis / NoogaRadio 92.7 FM The essential question is: Does respondent Barnes have discretion to obey the law, or does she have to obey state law? Relator rejects the court’s order that says discretion operates before compliance, not just after. [Today this investigative reporter filed a motion demanding chancery court judge Pamela Fleenor rewrite … Continue reading In CV-19 ‘crisis,’ does Barnes have discretion to obey law? Or does she have to obey law?
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed