Because the state has an interest in maintaining a policy denying the people their right of free communication and movement, it works to confuse the vocabulary and terminology its victims try to use in court to assert their due process rights. By David Tulis / 92.7 NoogaRadio Judges and prosecutors such as Neal Pinkston pretend that right and privilege are indistinguishable, and for a defendant to ask about the scope of a privilege in a transportation/traffic case (called “driving” or “operating” in traffic cases) is inadmissible, irrelevant, misguided and should be squashed. In the May 6 sessions court hearing of … Continue reading Parker hearing lays out state method in quashing free travel